Getting Real: How to Build More Reliable Consumer Insights

Written By Grace Sogbesan

💡 Quick Take: Professional survey takers are reshaping market research. Up to 1 in 5 online survey responses come from people who make a living telling companies what they want to hear.

Picture this: Sarah completes 12 surveys before breakfast. She knows exactly how to describe herself as a "premium shopper" for one survey and a "budget-conscious mom" for another. She's mastered the art of passing screening questions and can spot a test question from a mile away.

Sarah isn't real, but she represents thousands of professional survey takers who are shaping the products and services we use every day.

And that should make us think differently about consumer research.

By The Numbers: The Survey Economy

The Blind Spot in Modern Market Research

Let me share something that keeps me up at night as a marketer with over a decade in the field: We might be building entire business strategies on feedback from people who've turned survey-taking into a performance art. Just last year, my team discovered that nearly 25% of our consumer panel members were participating in more than 10 surveys per week across different brands. It's like running a restaurant based on reviews from food critics who've never actually eaten there but have gotten really good at describing meals.

🔍 Industry Insight: According to the Market Research Society's 2023 Data Quality Report, up to 20% of online survey responses come from "high-frequency respondents." Their analysis found these participants are 3x more likely to provide what they perceive as "desirable" answers rather than honest feedback.

Behind the Curtain

Meet Tom (not his real name), who shared his "survey success strategies" with me over coffee. He's part of 23 different survey panels and makes about $200 a week answering surveys. "I know what they want to hear," he told me, sipping his latte. "If they're asking about luxury cars, I become the luxury car guy. If it's about grocery shopping habits, I'm suddenly very passionate about organic produce." When I asked how he gets around demographic requirements, he smiled. "There's usually a pattern to the qualifying questions. Once you've seen enough of them, you know exactly what to say to get in."

⚠️ Red Flags in Survey Data

  1. Lightning-fast completion times: Our analysis shows genuine respondents typically take 1.8x longer than professional survey takers

  2. Perfectly consistent answers: Look for too-perfect pattern matching across multiple choice questions

  3. Textbook-perfect responses: Watch for answers that read like marketing copy rather than authentic opinions

  4. Multiple survey participation: Track unique identifiers across surveys to spot frequent participants

  5. Pattern response behaviors: Use specialized analytics to detect "straight-lining" (selecting the same answer repeatedly) and other suspicious patterns

The Money Trail

Follow the money, and things get even more fascinating. One survey platform manager (who asked to remain anonymous) admitted, "We know some people are gaming the system. But if we make the screening too strict, we won't hit our quotas. And clients always want their results yesterday." The economics of the research industry create perverse incentives: survey platforms need volume, respondents want income, and brands demand quick insights.

🌟 Success Story: Companies like Trader Joe's combine survey data with actual purchase histories and in-store behavior, resulting in 43% more accurate consumer insights. According to their Head of Consumer Research, "We've built a framework that validates what people say against what they actually do in our stores."

The Real Cost

Think about what this means:

Common Research Mishaps:

  • New product launches based on artificial feedback (like the infamous Crystal Pepsi, which tested well but flopped in market)

  • Ad campaigns targeting misrepresented demographics (as happened with a major fitness brand that designed a campaign for "health-conscious millennials" who turned out to be mostly professional survey takers)

  • Strategy decisions built on performative responses (I've personally seen a retail client invest millions in a store concept that performed well in surveys but flopped with real customers)

What Actually Works: Success Stories

  • Nike: Built a verified customer panel of 5,000+ active users whose purchase history is matched to their feedback

  • Tesla: Combines owner feedback with real usage data from their connected vehicles

  • Starbucks: Integrates purchase history from their app with survey responses, verifying that respondents actually bought what they claim

  • Apple: Uses multi-source behavioral data verification, combining online behavior, purchase history, and survey responses

The Way Forward

Instead of just pointing fingers, let's talk solutions that I've seen work firsthand:

1. Smart Verification

✓ Purchase history validation: Link survey responses to actual transaction data
✓ Multi-source data verification: Compare stated preferences against observed behaviors
✓ Behavioral pattern analysis: Use AI to detect professional survey-taking patterns
✓ Real-time engagement monitoring: Track engagement signals during survey completion

2. Better Incentives

✓ Long-term relationship building: Create consumer panels with deeper, ongoing engagement
✓ Quality-based rewards: Pay for thoughtful responses rather than completion alone
✓ Community involvement: Involve consumers in the product development process
✓ Meaningful feedback loops: Show participants how their input shaped actual decisions

3. Mixed Methods

✓ Combined data sources: Never rely on surveys alone
✓ Social listening integration: Capture organic conversations about your category
✓ Passive data collection: Use opt-in behavioral tracking with full transparency
✓ Video feedback implementation: Have consumers show and tell rather than just tell

ROI of Better Research:

  • 43% more accurate consumer insights (McKinsey Consumer Insights Study, 2023)

  • 37% reduction in failed product launches (Product Development Consortium, 2024)

  • 52% better prediction of consumer behavior (Harvard Business Review, 2023)

  • 28% increase in campaign effectiveness (Digital Marketing Institute, 2024)

The Bright Side

Here's the exciting part: we're at a turning point. The same technology that enabled professional survey-taking is now helping us build more authentic consumer connections. In my own practice, we've implemented a multi-layered verification system that reduced suspicious responses by 78% while actually improving overall response quality and actionability.

🎯 Action Steps for Better Research

Verify respondent authenticity using digital fingerprinting and progressive profiling Use multiple data sources including behavioral data, transaction history, and qualitative inputs Build long-term consumer relationships through branded communities instead of one-off surveys Implement quality over quantity metrics in your research KPIs Create genuine feedback loops where participants see their impact

Because sometimes the most important insight isn't in the data – it's in questioning how that data came to be. And maybe, just maybe, that's exactly what we need to build better products, create better services, and understand our consumers better than ever before.

📌 Key Takeaway: While the survey industrial complex isn't going away overnight, we can choose to build something better – something that actually helps us understand what consumers really want, need, and value.

Now that's data worth collecting.

Want to learn more about building better consumer insights? Check out my companion piece: "Building Authentic Consumer Connections in a Digital Age"

Sources Consulted

Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Lie for a dime: When most prescreening responses are honest but most study participants are impostors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 500-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617698203

Downes-Le Guin, T., Baker, R., Mechling, J., & Ruyle, E. (2012). Myths and realities of respondent engagement in online surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 54(5), 613-633. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-5-613-633

Guin, T. D. L., Baker, R., Mechling, J., & Ruyle, E. (2012). Myths and realities of respondent engagement in online surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 54(5), 613-633. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-5-613-633

Kennedy, C., Mercer, A., Keeter, S., Hatley, N., McGeeney, K., & Gimenez, A. (2022). Assessing the risks to online polls from bogus respondents. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2022/02/16/assessing-the-risks-to-online-polls-from-bogus-respondents/

Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (2nd ed., pp. 263-314). Emerald Group Publishing.

McGeeney, K. (2023). The Challenge of Online Panels: Understanding Professional Respondents. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/04/the-challenge-of-online-panels-understanding-professional-respondents/

Revilla, M., & Ochoa, C. (2017). Ideal and maximum length for a web survey. International Journal of Market Research, 59(5), 557-565. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2017-039

Smith, S. M., Roster, C. A., Golden, L. L., & Albaum, G. S. (2016). A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3139-3148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.002

Steger, M. B. (2019). Consumer Research Methods: Integrating Digital and Traditional Research Strategies. Harvard Business Review Press.

Zhang, C., & Conrad, F. (2018). Speeding in web surveys: The tendency to answer very fast and its association with straightlining. Survey Research Methods, 12(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2018.v12i1.7131

Grace Sogbesan
Previous

Building Authentic Consumer Connections in a Digital Age
Next

Virtual Try-Ons in Fashion: Can AR Truly Replace In-Store Shopping?